
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 263 (2024) 129742
2
high-pressure and ultrasound technologies to enhance encapsulation
[10]. They delved into applying legume protein microcapsules in novel
food design and bioavailability enhancement. In conclusion, as crucial
macromolecular polymers in the food industry, proteins can serve as
excellent wall materials for microcapsules. However, serving as the
primary constituents of microcapsule wall materials, proteins from an-
imals and plants exhibit fundamentally distinct structures. Varied
polypeptide sequences and diverse secondary structures result in
distinct tertiary structures, inuencing the manifestation of specic
functional properties in proteins, including solubility, gelation, emulsi-
cation, and foaming [11]. In contrast to proteins from animal sources,
vegetable proteins, particularly those derived from legumes, exhibit
lower solubility, insufcient emulsication properties, and restricted
responsiveness to pH, ionic strength, and temperature. Simultaneously,
plant proteins possess a high molecular weight and intricate structure,
with certain amino acids or functional groups concealed within the
protein core, potentially impeding interactions with charged poly-
saccharides [10,12]. Additionally, these structural distinctions
contribute to the varied application characteristics of microcapsules.
Although the aforementioned reviews have provided insights into
the utilization of specic proteins as microcapsule wall materials, a
systematic review of protein-based microcapsules is still needed to fully
encompass this eld's breadth. Protein-based microcapsules, fabricated
using various wall materials and preparation methods, exhibit distinct
structures and properties, making them versatile for different applica-
tions [13]. Therefore, a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the
preparation and application of protein-based microcapsules would be
precious for researchers, enabling them to design microcapsules with
enhanced performance and broader uses. This review aims to provide a
thorough overview of the diverse types of proteins used in microcapsule
wall materials, the preparation processes involved, the key factors
inuencing their properties, and the wide-ranging applications of
protein-based microcapsules based on prior research. Its goal is to
facilitate a deeper understanding of this eld and offer practical rec-
ommendations for the adequate preparation and application of protein-
based microcapsules.
2. Structure of protein-based microcapsules
The “microcapsule” is generally dened as particles featuring be-
tween 1 and 1000
μ
m in size with a shell-core structure [14,15]. Protein-
based microcapsules are commonly characterized by a spherical or
irregular shape and possess a shell-core or matrix structure, as noted in
previous literature (Fig. 1) [16]. These microcapsules can be classied
based on the number of cores present, with single-core or multi-core
microcapsules being the two main categories [17,18]. The number of
capsule wall layers can also be used to categorize microcapsules, with
mono-layer or multi-layer microcapsules being the two main types.
Multi-layer microcapsules are typically produced through a layer-by-
layer process [19]. The core of a microcapsule can consist of one or
more substances, which can either be encased within the inner core or
dispersed within the wall material [20–22]. Protein-based
microcapsules exhibit diverse surface morphologies, including smooth,
concave, crumpled, cracked, and microporous surfaces. Nevertheless,
surface pores and cracks may result in the unregulated release of the
payload. To enhance microcapsule stability and enable controlled
release, a shell is typically incorporated onto the surface or cross-linked
using chemical or biological cross-linkers [23,24]. The characteristics of
microcapsules, including their surface morphology, size, shape, and
structure, are determined by various factors such as the core and wall
materials used and the preparation techniques employed. Microcapsules
produced by spray-drying are typically found to have concave and
wrinkled surfaces [25]. The structure of microcapsules confers distinct
properties and application possibilities. For example, single-core single-
shell microcapsules possess a simple structure and a large core volume,
resulting in higher drug loading. However, once the shell is ruptured, the
contents are rapidly released. Conversely, multi-layer microcapsules
offer better stability during thermal treatment and other processes,
thereby enhancing the encapsulated substances' protection. Further-
more, multi-layer and multi-core microcapsules allow for the slow and
continuous release of substances, making them ideal for applications
such as controlled drug release, avor release, and food preservation
[26]. This research direction holds a prominent position, driving re-
searchers to explore the most suitable wall materials and preparation
methods for various purposes, potentially revolutionizing advancements
in microencapsulation and opening new avenues for applications.
3. Microcapsule wall materials
Protein-based microcapsules can be divided into three categories
based on their wall material composition: single protein microcapsules,
which utilize a single type of protein as the sole material; composite
protein microcapsules, which incorporate a combination of protein and
other components for enhanced properties; and modied protein mi-
crocapsules, where the protein structure is chemically or structurally
modied to achieve specic characteristics (Figs. 2 and 3).
3.1. Single protein
Legume protein solutions, including soy protein [35], pea protein
isolate [36], and faba bean protein [37], can undergo self-assembly into
hollow microcapsules with pH and ionic strength dependence through
thermal treatment. Zhao et al. proposed a mechanism for ion-induced
phase separation and thermally induced microcapsule formation by
observing morphological changes during the self-assembly of soy 11s
protein [38]. Specically, sodium chloride induces phase separation of
soy 11s protein. The presence of sodium ions neutralizes the protein's
surface charge, reducing electrostatic repulsion. This leads to forming
protein clusters and irregular protein ocs through weak non-covalent
bonding interactions such as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, or
hydrophobic interactions. Subsequently, when the proteins are heated
to 80 ◦C, they start to denature. The protein ocs gradually gel, forming
spherical hollow microcapsules within 60 s. This process is accompanied
by the exposure of hydrophobic groups (portions of the protein structure
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of main morphologies of protein-based microcapsules.
D. Ma et al.