Food Chemistry 401 (2023) 134127
2
Ruixue et al., 2020), egg (Lozano-Ojalvo et al., 2016), and wheat gluten
(Horiguchi et al., 2005). There is a tremendous amount of Ulva prolifera
available from the ocean; however, very few studies have been con-
ducted on the immunomodulatory peptide from its protein.
The aim of the present study was designed to develop a promising
ACE inhibitory peptide from Ulva prolifera and determine its immuno-
modulatory activity. In addition, its gastrointestinal stability, inhibitory
pattern, and molecular interaction mechanism were explored. Finally,
the cellular mechanism by which the puried peptide regulates blood
pressure was explored in human umbilical vein endothelial cells
(HUVECs).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials and chemicals
Ulva prolifera was obtained from Institute of Oceanography, Chinese
Academy of Sciences (Qingdao, China). Angiotensin I-converting
enzyme (from rabbit lung), N-hippuril-L-histidy-L-leucine (HHL),
Angiotensin II (Ang II), alcalase and papain were purchased from San-
gon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Sephadex G-100 were purchased from
Auyoo Biotechnology Co. (Shanghai, China). Human Endothelin-1 (ET-
1) ELISA Kit was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).
Nitric Oxide Assay Kit was purchased from Beyotime (shanghai, China).
MTT cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay kits were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). HUVECs cell line was purchased
from SSRCC (Shanghai, China). All other reagents were of analytical
reagent grade.
2.2. Preparation of Ulva prolifera protein
The protein was extracted according to the previous report (Li et al.,
2020) with slight modications. Dry powder of Ulva prolifera was soaked
in double-distilled water (1:20, w/v). The pH value of the mixture was
adjusted to 10 (using 1 M NaOH), before stirring at 37 ◦C for 3 h. Then,
the suspension was centrifuged at 1000 r/min for 15 min to obtain the
supernatant. Subsequently, the pH value of above solution was adjusted
to 4.5 (using 1 M HCl) to precipitate the protein. Finally, the puried
protein was freeze-dried and stored at −20 ◦C until further analysis.
2.3. Preparation of hydrolysate of Ulva prolifera protein
Ulva prolifera protein solution (10 %, w/v) was adjusted to the
appropriate pH and temperature, before adding some commercial pro-
teases (1 % enzyme/substrate, E/S, w/w protein). The enzymes and
digestion conditions used in present study were alcalase (pH 9.0,
50.8 ◦C, 3500 U/g), neutral protease (pH 7.4, 47 ◦C, 3500 U/g), papain
(pH 7.2, 45.7 ◦C, 1250 U/g), alcalase-papain (pH 9.0, 50.8 ◦C, 3500 U/g-
pH 7.2, 45.7 ◦C, 1250 U/g), and pepsin-trypsin (Ph 2.0, 37 ◦C, 3500 U/g-
pH 8.1, 37 ◦C, 1250 U/g). The hydrolysis reaction of each enzyme lasted
for 1 h and was then terminated by boiling water bath.
2.4. Degree of hydrolysis and peptide yield
The degree of hydrolysisi (DH) of the Ulva prolifera protein was
measured according to the pH stat method reported by Pan et al (Pan
et al., 2016). Glutathione reduced (GSH) was used to establish the
standard curve for quantication of peptide concentration. A 2.5 mL
solution was mixed with the same volume of trichloroacetic acid (TCA)
(10 %, w/v). Subsequently, the mixture was let stand at room temper-
ature for 10 min and then centrifugated at 4000 r/min, for 15 min. The
supernatant was transferred into a volumetric ask, and diluted with
TCA (5 %, w/v) to 50 mL, Then, 3 mL of the above solution was mixed
with 2 mL biuret reagent and placed as the above steps. Finally, the
mixture was centrifugated (2000r/min, 10 min) and the absorbance of
the supernatant was measured at 540 nm with a UV–visible
spectrophotometer ZG-EU-2600 (ZHUO GUANG Corporation, Shanghai,
China). The peptide yield was determined by the ratio of peptide mass to
protein mass.
2.5. Determination of ACE inhibitory activity.
The ACE inhibitory rate was explored according to previous report
(Pan et al., 2016). Briey, 80
μ
L of 5 mM HHL solution was mixed with
10
μ
L of peptide solution, followed by incubation for 5 min at 37 ◦C.
Subsequently, 10
μ
L of ACE solution (0.1 U/mL) was added, followed by
incubation at 37 ◦C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by 200
μ
L
HCl (1 M). In the blank group, peptide solution was replaced by 0.1 M
sodium borate buffer. The reaction production was extracted with 1500
μ
L of ethyl acetate with slight oscillation for 1 min. Then, the mixture
was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min, 1 mL of supernatant was
transferred to another test tube, mixed with 1000
μ
L of acetic anhydride
and 2000
μ
L of 0.5% (V/V) p-dimethyl amino benzaldehyde in pyridine,
and then incubated at 40 ◦C for 30 min prior to spectrophotometrical
measurement at 459 nm. The degree of ACE inhibition (in percentage)
was calculated according to Eq. (1):
The inhibition of ACE (%)=(Ab−Aa)/(Ab−Ac) × 100% (1)
where A
a
represents the mixture of HHL, peptide and ACE; A
b
represents
the mixture of HHL and ACE; A
c
represents the mixture of HHL and
inactive ACE. The IC
50
value was dened as the inhibitor concentration
inhibiting 50 % activity of ACE.
2.6. Purication of ACE-inhibitory peptides from hydrolysates
Hydrolysates were puried using a Sephadex-G100 column (2.5 cm
×70 cm) that was eluted with ultrapure water at a ow rate of 1.0 mL/
min. Fractions were collected at 2 min intervals, and each was explored
for ACE inhibitory activity. The fraction with the highest ACE inhibitory
activity was fractionated using an ultraltration membrane, and yielded
three fractions: <3 kDa, 3–10 kDa, and >10 kDa. Then, the highest
active fraction was frozen at -20 ◦C.
2.7. Determination of peptide sequences
The puried fractions were analyzed by online nano ow liquid
chromatography tandem mass spectrometry performed on an EASY-
nano LC 1200 system (Thermo Fisher Scientic, MA, USA) connected
to a PepMap C18 (75
μ
m ×25 cm) (HPLC-MS/MS) as equilibrated with
solvent A (A: 0.1 % formic acid in water) and solvent B (B: 0.1 % formic
acid in ACN). The amino acid sequences of the peptides were determined
by de novo sequencing using PEAKS Studio version X+(Bioinformatics
Solutions Inc., Waterloo, Canada) and Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB:
Homepage).
2.8. Screening and synthesis of the potential ACE inhibitory peptides
Using the identied peptides, the reported anti-ACE peptides were
determined by BIOPEP (https://biochemia.uwm.edu.pl/biopep-uwm/)
and eliminated, and the remaining peptides were further evaluated. The
biological activity potential of the peptides was determined at Peptide
Ranker (http://distilldeep.ucd.ie/PeptideRanker/). Solubility was
calculated at (Innovagen AB: Antibodies, proteins, and peptides).
Toxicity was measured at ToxinPred (osdd.net). Human intestinal ab-
sorption (HIA) was evaluated at admetSAR (ecust.edu.cn). Then, the
unreported polypeptides with biological activity potential, good water
solubility, no toxin, high human intestinal absorptivity, high blood–-
brain barrier permeability were obtained. Furthermore, the afnities
between the selected peptides and ACE were evaluated by molecular
docking in Discovery Studio 2020 software (DS 2020, Accelrys, San
Diego, CA, USA). ACE crystal structure (ID: 1O8A) was selected as the
Z. Li et al.