Food Chemistry 423 (2023) 136322
2
document relating to entrapped starch and its application is still not
widely revealed. Consequently, this work aims to provide a compre-
hensive review of current encapsulation techniques used to encapsulate
starch and its properties (such as morphologies, swelling, solubility,
texture properties, pasting properties, thermal properties, in vitro starch
digestion, and postprandial glycemic response), which could be used
as background information. Additionally, this review underscores the
signicance of elucidating the current theory on the mechanisms by
which shell matrices regulate starch hydrolysis, and highlights the po-
tential impact of encapsulated starch in food production.
2. Starch encapsulation
Encapsulation is a method for entrapping the core materials inside a
continuous thin shell which has been extensively applied in the drug
delivery system (Buonomenna, 2016). The general purposes of encap-
sulation are i) defending the core materials from adverse environmental
effects (e.g., pH, temperature, humidity), ii) controlling or delaying the
timed release, and iii) combining two incompatible composites for a
multifunctional structure (Hu, Guo, Yu, Cao, & Xu, 2017).
2.1. Starch encapsulation techniques
In this part, the encapsulation methods and other relevant tech-
niques that have currently been applied to encapsulate starch granules
for preventing enzymatic digestion or controlling glucose released are
discussed.
2.1.1. Ionotropic/ionic gelation method
Currently, the most prevalent technique used for preparing entrap-
ped starch is the ionotropic/ionic gelation method which is also known
as spherication (categorized as physicochemical encapsulation tech-
nique). Firstly, the dispersion of starch and encapsulants are prepared
before ejecting or spraying it into crosslinking agents through a syringe
pump, the electrospinning has been applied to control the ejection rate
in some research works (Mehta et al., 2022). Negatively charged non-
–starch polysaccharides such as sodium alginate, gellan, carrageenan,
and their mixtures have widely been used as encapsulating agents while
calcium chloride (2–5% w/v) solution is frequently used as a cross-
linking agent (Park et al., 2014), as they could form ionic inter-
actions that are called the “egg–box” model (Hamaker, Venktachalam,
Zhang, Keshavarzian, & Rose, 2013). So far sodium alginate (including
the mix thereof) has predominantly been used as an encapsulant due to
its great crosslinking interactions achieved by exchanging sodium ions
from the glucuronic acids (GlcAs) with divalent cations, promoting self-
assembled structures which cause microsphere formation (Xiong, Wang,
Chen, & Peng, 2018). The developments of shell networks originate after
the injection of the starch–encapsulant dispersion into the crosslinking
solution. During this process, a dispersion comprising starch granules
and encapsulant is transformed into droplets, wherein the encapsulant
charges engage in interactions with crosslinking ions (Ca
2+
). The ionic
interactions create the rigid gel networks that physically wrap and pack
starch granules that are existed in the droplets which simultaneously
cause the creation of self-assembled microspheres. The scheme of the
shell matrix and microparticle formation through the ionic gelation
method is presented in Fig. 1. The success of starch encapsulation by this
technique is highly based on the ability of encapsulants to interact with
ions of crosslinking agents or vice versa since it determines the forma-
tion of shell matrices and encapsulation efciency. This method has
been reported to successfully control starch amylolysis and glucose
release of waxy–normal corn, potato, (native, boiled, or roasted) pea,
high amylose, amylosucrase (AS)–treated waxy corn starches (Ning, Cui,
& Yuan, 2020; Lu et al., 2018; Park et al., 2014). The factors that need to
be concerned to achieve starch encapsulation by this approach are the
characteristics and concentrations of encapsulants and crosslinking
agents, including the ratios between starch and encapsulant.
2.1.2. Spray drying method
Spray drying method is the most common physicomechanical tech-
niques that have commonly been applied for encapsulation purposes,
however, these techniques are may not approachable compared to ionic
gelatinization since they are generally proper for producing encapsu-
lated starch in a big batch, and the properties or physical appearance of
the obtained products could be inconsistent due to the limits of encap-
sulation parameter optimization. In the spray drying process, the
dispersion of starch and encapsulant materials are primarily prepared
before pumping through the spray drying nozzle. Proteins have mostly
been reported to be used as encapsulating agents. Recently, only Krai-
thong, Theppawong, Ai, and Issara (2023b) employed non-starch poly-
saccharides (sodium alginate, guar gum, and their mixtures, at 1% w/v)
as encapsulant materials to encapsulate native corn starch through the
spray drying method. After atomization, the starch–encapsulant
dispersion is generated into droplets encountering a hot air stream in the
spray drying chamber; unfolded proteins subsequently adhere to starch
surfaces mostly through hydrogen bonds and van der Waals force (Yang,
Zhong, Goff, & Li, 2019). Then, the droplets are rapidly vaporized and
consequently solidied (the rigid shell protein matrices are formed on
starch surfaces, creating solid particles) before being collected in the
collector, as displayed in Fig. 1. This encapsulation technique has
effectively been used to encapsulate corn starch with different concen-
trations of zein, at a ow rate of 15 mL/min and at the inlet and outlet
temperatures of 120 ◦C and 90 ◦C, respectively (Xu & Zhang, 2014). The
encapsulation efciency may be inuenced by factors such as the con-
centrations, viscosity, and ratios of starch and encapsulant in the
dispersion of the starch-shell material.
2.1.3. Homogenization
This method is recognized as another physicomechanical technique
for starch encapsulation. In this process, starch and encapsulating ma-
terials are initially intermixed together via physical forces before un-
dergoing the drying process. This method has been used to encapsulate
the retrograded debranched corn and proso millet starches with konjac
glucomannan and proteins (e.g., zein, soy, and whey protein isolates)
(Ning et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2020). Ning et al. (2020) dissolved
konjac glucomannan (3–12% based on corn starch weight corn starch) in
water before adding debranched corn starch into the dispersions. The
mixtures were further stirred for 20 min and homogenized using an
ultrahigh–pressure homogenizer for 5 min before incubating at room
temperature for 8 h and drying at 50 ◦C. Zheng et al. (2020) mixed zein
(15%, w/w, based on starch dry weight) with 300 mL ethanol (60%, v/
v) before adding proso millet starch to the zein dispersion. Soy protein
isolates and starch were mixed at a ratio of 5:1 and dissolved in phos-
phate buffer (pH 7.8) with constant stirring. Whey protein isolates were
rstly dispersed in distilled water with constant stirring for obtaining a
10% concentration. Then, the protein dispersion was adjusted pH to 7
using 1 M NaOH solution and was left overnight at 4 ◦C with magnetic
stirring. The proso millet starch slurry (30%, w/v) was nally added to
the whey protein solution under mechanical stirring. Lastly, all samples
were incubated at 90 ◦C for 30 min and then freeze–dried till moisture
content was lower than 10%. In physicomechanical encapsulation
methods, starch granules are randomly enclosed or trapped by the rigid
protein matrices. These techniques are rapid approaches to producing
encapsulated starch by reason of low cost and convenient operation
(since there are no crosslinking agents involved). Nevertheless, the
limitations of using these approaches are still found as described before.
2.1.4. Anti-solvent/nanoprecipitation technique
The chemical techniques which are anti-solvent/nanoprecipitation
technique and protein crosslinking have been adapted to produce cor-
e–shell starch/zein microparticles by Wang et al. (2022). The anti-
solvent/nanoprecipitation usually involves the precipitation mecha-
nism which the nanoparticle formation is occurred by the addition of
antisolvent to solvent (Liu & Yang, 2018; Viçosa, Letourneau, Espitalier,
S. Kraithong et al.