Research proved that the bitter taste of hydrolysates was
mainly caused by bitter peptides rather than free amino
acids.
19
The sequence, length and spatial structure influence
the bitterness of peptides.
20–22
Different enzymes with varied
specificities produced different types of bitter peptides.
23
Therefore, it was expected that low-bitterness hydrolysates can
be produced by controlling the release of bitter peptides.
However, the release pattern of bitter peptides by different
enzymes remains unknown. Daher et al.
24
established a
method to screen bitter peptides using a heat map and
random forests. The random forests model is a tree-based
approach, which was used to model the bitterness descriptor
as a function of a number of predictors (presence, absence or
normalised abundance of peptides) and quantify the contri-
bution of each predictor in the study above. Therefore, we
expected to reveal the dominant bitter peptides and their
release patterns in casein hydrolysates using peptidomics and
random forests, in order to develop a novel strategy to prepare
casein hydrolysates with low bitterness and high digestibility.
In this study, trypsin, alcalase, papain, neutrase, and fla-
vourzyme were used to prepare casein hydrolysates at the DH
of 3%, 5.5%, 8%, 10.5%, and 13%. The digestibility character-
istics in an in vitro infant digest model and the bitterness of
each hydrolysate were evaluated. PCA was used to reveal the
effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on the digestibility and bitter-
ness of casein hydrolysates. Furthermore, peptides in each
hydrolysate were characterized by UPLC-MS/MS and random
forests were used to screen peptides which contribute to the
bitterness. The peptidomics analysis was carried out to reveal
the mechanism of different bitterness increase behaviors
during hydrolysis in hydrolysates obtained using different
enzymes. Finally, casein hydrolysates with low bitterness and
high digestibility were prepared.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
Casein from bovine milk was purchased from Fonterra Co-
operative Group (Richmond, Victoria, Australia). Pepsin from
porcine gastric mucosa (P7012) was purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Trypsin was provided by Pangbo
Biological Engineering Co. Ltd (Guangxi, China). Alcalase, neu-
trase and flavourzyme were provided by Novozymes
Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Tianjin, China). Papain was provided
by Solarbio Science & Technology Co. Ltd (Beijing, China).
Methanol (MS grade), acetonitrile (MS grade) and formic acid
(HPLC grade) for UPLC-MS were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Other chemicals used were of
analytical grade.
2.2 Enzymatic hydrolysis of casein
Trypsin, alcalase, papain, neutrase, and flavourzyme were used
to hydrolyze casein. The hydrolysis was carried out according
to Yu et al.
25
with some modifications. Briefly, casein was dis-
persed in distilled water by the ratio of 1 : 10 (w/w). The mix-
tures were adjusted to the optimum pH of enzymes before
enzyme addition and placed in a THZ-82A shaking water bath
(Jintan Ronghua Instrument Manufacture Co., Ltd, Jiangsu,
China) at the optimum temperature of enzymes for 4 h. The
optimal conditions for each enzyme used were as follows:
trypsin, 37 °C, pH 7.5; alcalase, 55 °C, pH 8.0; papain, 55 °C,
pH 7.0; neutrase, 50 °C, pH 7.0; and flavourzyme, 50 °C, pH
7.0. The enzyme/substrate ratio was adjusted to obtain hydroly-
sates with DH of 3%, 5.5%, 8%, 10.5%, and 13%, respectively.
To terminate the hydrolysis, the mixture was heated in boiling
water for 15 min. Subsequently, the mixtures were centrifuged
for 15 min at 8000gand 4 °C. Then, the supernatants were col-
lected, freeze-dried, and stored at −20 °C until use.
2.3 Degree of hydrolysis (DH)
The DH of casein hydrolysates was measured by an o-phthalal-
dehyde (OPA) assay according to Wang et al.
26
with modifi-
cations. Briefly, 180 μL of the OPA reagent was mixed with
24 μL of samples. After 2 min of incubation, the absorbance
was measured using a ReadMax 1900 microplate reader
(Shanpu Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) at 340 nm.
Distilled water or serine solution (0.97 mM) was used as the
control or standard, respectively.
2.4 SDS-PAGE analysis of hydrolysates
Hydrolysate-lyophilized powders were dissolved in reducing
loading buffer at 2 mg mL
−1
and heated in boiling water for
5 min. After centrifugation at 10 000gfor 5 min, 10 μL of the
supernatant was loaded for electrophoretic analysis. The separ-
ation gel and concentration gel were 12% (w/w) and 5% (w/w),
respectively. Electrophoretic separations were carried out at 80
V for about 2 h. The gels were stained with 0.25% Coomassie
blue R-250 solution for about 1 h and then decolored with a
decoloring solution (10% glacial acetic acid, 10% methanol
and 80% distilled water) until the band was clear.
2.5 Precipitation ratio and soluble protein content of
hydrolysates at pH 4.5
Hydrolysate-lyophilized powders were diluted in sodium
acetate buffer (0.2 M, pH 4.5) at a concentration of 2% (w/v).
The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 10 000gand the
soluble protein content in the supernatant was determined
using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Dingguo Biotechnology Co. Ltd,
Beijing, China). Meanwhile, the precipitate was collected,
washed with buffer and then centrifuged for 15 min at
10 000g, repeated twice and then weighed after being freeze-
dried. The precipitation ratio was calculated as follows:
Precipitation ratio ð%Þ¼Wprecipitate=Wtotal 100;ð1Þ
where W
precipitate
is the weight of the precipitate and W
total
is
the weight of the hydrolysate-lyophilized powder.
2.6 In vitro simulated gastric digestion
The in vitro simulated gastric digestion was carried out accord-
ing to the INFOGEST model
27
with some modifications. The
Paper Food & Function
Food Funct. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023
Published on 12 July 2023. Downloaded by HeFei University of Technology on 7/12/2023 12:51:07 PM.