
Food Bioscience 61 (2024) 104502
2
can penetrate and hydrolyze the amorphous region of semi-crystalline
growth rings. The thickness of lamellar structure of canna starch in-
creases in amorphous lamellae but decreases in crystalline lamellae after
α
-amylase treatment (Lan et al., 2016). It is inconsistent with previous
research that the thickness of semi-crystalline lamellae is 2–5 nm in
amorphous regions and 5–7 nm in crystalline regions, respectively (Le
Corre et al., 2010). Therefore, it is necessary to systematically investi-
gate the detailed information about lamellar structure of starch during
enzymatical hydrolysis.
The granule microstructure (pores/channels) and the nanostructure
of the growth-rings inuence the access of enzymes to their substrates,
determining the enzymatic digestibility (Blazek & Gilbert, 2010). Starch
granule-associated proteins are distributed on the surface, channels and
matrix of starch granules, and are respectively called granule
surface-proteins, granule channel-proteins (GCP) and granule
intrinsic-proteins (Kasarda et al., 2008). Extraction of starch granule
surface and channel proteins (GSCP) induces nano-scale surface
roughening, greater specic surface area and larger channel diameter
(pore size) in starch granules (Ma et al., 2021). Moreover, GSCP removal
increases the rate of
α
-amylase hydrolysis of rice starch and results in
larger pores, channels, and cavities at the granular level. However, at the
lamellar and molecular structure levels, the changes of rice starch after
removal of GSCP during
α
-amylase hydrolysis are still unknown.
In this study, rice starch granules after removal of GSCP or GCP
during
α
-amylase hydrolysis were analyzed by SAXS. We determined the
change of the lamellar structure during
α
-amylase hydrolysis by 1D
linear correlation and fractal analysis. The amylopectin ne structure
was also determined to investigate the structural changes at the mo-
lecular level, which may provide a more profound insight into the
changes in
α
-amylase hydrolyzed starch and the inuence of GSCP on
starch.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
BP602 (waxy rice) and JA166 (non-waxy rice) were provided by
Zhejiang University. Amylose contents(AACC, 2000; Method 61-03) on
a dry starch basis were 0.1% and 14%. Porcine pancreas
α
-amylase
(A3176) and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were supplied by Sigma
Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Sodium carbonate and ethanol were purchased
from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
2.2. Removal of starch granule-associated proteins from starches
Starches were extracted from waxy and non-waxy rice to obtain WRS
and NRS and GCP or GSCP were extracted from starches (WRS-C, NRS-C
or WRS-S, NRS-S) followed the method of Zhan et al. (2020). In brief,
starch (70 g, d.b.) was thoroughly mixed with 200 mL buffer and the
suspension was magnetically stirred for 48 h. The buffer for extraction of
GCP contains 0.1% SDS, 0.2% mercaptoethanol, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8)
and 10% glycerol, and 1.5% SDS, 2% mercaptoethanol, 50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8) and 10% glycerol for extraction of GSCP. After the centrifugation
(6000×g, 15 min), starch layer was resuspended in ethanol (80%, 500
mL) and ltered through a Buchner funnel. Then starches were dried at
room temperature to a constant weight. The protein content for WRS,
WRS-C, WRS-S and NRS, NRS-C, NRS-S and were 0.27%, 0.13%, 0.10%
and 0.54%, 0.32%, 0.20%, respectively.
2.3. Staining protein in rice starch with uorescamine
Starches (15 mg) were dispersed in 0.1% (w/v) uorescamine (0.3
mL) in acetonitrile and 0.15 mL of 0.1M borate buffer (pH 8.0) at 25 ◦C
for 1 h, then centrifuged at 10000×g for 5 min and washed ve times
with MilliQ water. The samples were suspended in 50% glycerol, then
observed using a Super-resolution Multiphoton Confocal Microscope
(TCS SP8 STED 3X, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 100 ×oil objective
lens according to the previous method (Naguleswaran et al., 2011).
Images were collected with a 10-mW argon ion laser at 15% power with
405 excitations.
2.4.
α
-amylase hydrolysis of starches
The
α
-amylase hydrolysis of starches followed the method of Ma
et al. (2020). The activity of porcine pancreatic
α
-amylase was measured
as 7.5 units/mL according to the method of Gonz´
alez et al. 2002. One
unit of the enzyme activity is dened as the amount that liberates 1.0 mg
of maltose from starch in 3 min at pH 6.9 and 20 ◦C. Samples (50 mg, d.
b) was mixed with 15 mL PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.2) in a tube, then mixed
with porcine pancreatic
α
-amylase solution (2 mL, 15 U). Mixed system
was incubated in a shaking water bath at 37 ◦C. The reaction was
stopped using ice-cold sodium carbonate solution (0.5 M), then samples
were collected at 0, 10, 20, 60, and 120 min. The residue was then
re-washed with ethanol were then freeze-dried after centrifugation to
obtain native and hydrolyzed starches.
2.4.1. Scanning election microscopy (SEM)
Hydrolyzed starches with 120 min were placed on a double-sided
carbon adhesive tape and coated with gold. Images were collected
using a super resolution eld emission scanning electron microscope
(ZEISS GeminiSEM 450, Oberkochen, Germany) at an accelerating
voltage of 3 kV.
2.5. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)
Synchrotron time-resolved SAXS measurements were conducted on
the BL19U2 beam line in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility
(SSRF, China) using the method of Xu et al. (2020). The suspension with
a ratio of starch: distilled water of 1:9 (w/w) was equilibrated for 24 h
before SAXS tests. The suspension was loaded into 2-mm-thick sample
cells which were covered with Kapton tape. Data was measured for 1 s.
The detailed parameters for SSRF testing and the data were background
subtracted and normalized followed the previous report (Liu et al.,
2017).
2.6. Analysis of SAXS data
The SAXS data was tted to a power-law function plus a Gaussian
peak (Eq. (1)) (Blazek & Gilbert, 2010):
I(q)=B+Pq−
α
+A̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
ln 2
√
W̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
π
/4
√exp (−4ln 2(q−q0)2
W2)(1)
Where, B is the background; P is the power law pre-factor and
α
is the
power-law exponent; A is the Gaussian peak area, W (nm
−1
) is the full
width at half maximum of the peak, and q
0
(nm
−1
) is the peak center
position.
Abbreviations
GCP starch granule channel proteins
GSCP Starch granule surface and channel proteins
NRS non-waxy rice starch
NRS-GSCP non-waxy rice starch after removing GSCP
NRS-GCP non-waxy rice starch after removing GCP
WRS waxy rice starch
WRS- GSCP waxy rice starch after removing GSCP
WRS-GCP waxy rice starch after removing GCP
SAXS Small-angle X-ray scattering
X. Liu et al.