
Food Chemistry 451 (2024) 139221
2
Wongsagonsup, 2023). OSA has been approved by the FDA for use as a
starch modier in food products at a maximum allowable level of 3.0%
(w/w, amylose-based) (Sriprablom et al., 2023). Therefore, strategies to
enhance the starch esterication reaction of OSA are urgently needed to
further improve the starch properties. Cross-linking, the most commonly
used method for chemically modifying starch, involves creating inter-
and intramolecular linkages by guiding functional groups through
different cross-linking agents to random positions on the hydroxyl
groups of the starch molecule (Radi et al., 2022). As nontoxic cross-
linkers for starch, sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) and sodium trime-
taphosphate (STMP) offer advantages such as safe manufacturing, gentle
synthesis conditions, high reaction efciency, and cost-effectiveness
(Gao, Li, Bi, Mao, & Adhikari, 2014). Meanwhile, phosphorylation
cross-linking–modied starch reduces heat, acid, and shear sensitivity,
increases structural and thermal stability, and exhibits good gel char-
acteristics (Sriprablom et al., 2023). However, previous studies have
shown that cross-linked starch faces challenges related to poor freeze-
thaw stability and regrowth resistance (Sriprablom et al., 2023).
Ultrasonication is extensively used for starch modication as a green,
safe, and efcient physical treatment technology (Wang et al., 2022).
Ultrasonic action on aqueous starch solutions leads to cavitation, a
process where bubbles are generated in the suspension medium and
undergo periodic compression and expansion due to ultrasonic oscilla-
tory action. These bubbles bombard the starch granules, causing shear
forces upon collapse. The rapidly rupturing bubbles lead to the
destruction of starch granules and the exposure of more reaction sites.
The reaction is accelerated and accompanied by free radical effects,
energetic mechanical effects, and thermal effects (Chavez-Esquivel,
Cervantes-Cuevas, & Vera-Ramírez, 2022). However, studies on the
compound modication of cornstarch using chemical modifcornication
and ultrasound are limited. In addition, the dual modication of starch
has become increasingly popular in response to the inability of a single
modication to fully satisfy the specic needs of starch properties for
food and industrial applications.
This study compared the effects of ultrasonic treatments and three
chemical modications on the microstructure, molecular structure, and
functional properties of cornstarch. We aimed to develop methods to
improve the functional properties of starch and provide a reference for
broadening the applications of cornstarch by exploring the relationship
between the changes in the physicochemical properties of starch
induced by the dual modications and the structure.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Cornstarch (23% amylose and 77% amylopectin) was obtained from
Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals
were analytical grade.
2.2. Preparation of modied cornstarch
The cornstarch powder was dissolved in deionized water, stirred
magnetically at 500 rpm for 2 h at room temperature, and left to stand
for 12 h at 4 ◦C to prepare a certain concentration of cornstarch stock
solution for use.
2.2.1. Ultrasonication of cornstarch
The cornstarch stock (4% (w/v)) was sonicated in a probe-type
sonicator (JY98-IIIDN; Xiangfan Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai,
China). After ultrasonication, the starch suspension was centrifuged at
6000 rpm for 15 min. The starch precipitate was dried in a hot air oven
at 50 ◦C (Khurshida, Das, Deka, & Sit, 2021).
2.2.2. Oxidation of cornstarch
Cornstarch was oxidized with H
2
O
2
by following the method
proposed by Sangseethong, Termvejsayanon, and Sriroth (2010). The
cornstarch stock solution was prepared at a concentration of 35% (w/v),
and its pH was adjusted to 8.5 using 1 M NaOH. Further, 0.05% ferrous
sulfate (on a dry starch basis) was added to the starch solution as a
catalyst. The starch solution was stirred in a water bath at 45 ◦C and the
H
2
O
2
solution was added dropwise for 10 min to reach a nal concen-
tration of 5%. It was kept at pH 8.5 for 3 h. After that, 1 M HCl was added
to stop the reaction and bring the pH down to 6.5. The starch suspension
was washed thrice with distilled water and nally with anhydrous
ethanol. The oxidized starch was dried overnight at 50 ◦C in a vacuum
oven, followed by grinding, sieving, and storing in an air-tight container.
2.2.3. Esterication of cornstarch
Cornstarch was modied by esterication with OSA following the
method of Hui, Qi-he, Ming-liang, Qiong, and Guo-qing (2009) with
minor modications. The cornstarch stock solution was prepared at a
concentration of 35% (w/v), and its pH was adjusted to 8.5. Also, 3%
OSA (on a dry starch basis) was added for 1 h and treated at 35 ◦C for 2 h.
After that, 1 M HCl was added to stop the reaction and bring the pH
down to 6.5, followed by washing and drying in the same way as in the
case of oxidized starch.
2.2.4. Cross-linking of cornstarch
Cornstarch was cross-linked with STPP and STMP following the
method of Park et al. (2018). Cornstarch stock solution (35% (w/v)) was
added to 10% sodium sulfate (on a dry starch basis) and 10% STPP/
STMP (99:1) mixture (on a dry cornstarch basis). The pH of the mixed
solution was adjusted to 11.0, and placed in an oscillating water bath at
45 ◦C for 3 h. The pH was adjusted to 6.5 with 0.1 M HCl, followed by
washing and drying in the same manner as in the case of oxidized starch.
2.2.5. Dual-modication of cornstarch
Dual-modied starches were prepared by ultrasonic pre-treatment
followed by oxidation, esterication, and cross-linking of ultrasoni-
cally modied starches (as described in Sections 2.2.2, 2.2.3, and 2.2.4).
The names of the samples are listed in Table 1.
2.3. Determination of the degree of modication
The degree of oxidation was determined by measuring the total
starch carbonyl and carboxyl group contents using the method proposed
by Zhang et al. (2012). The degree of substitution was the average
number of substituted hydroxyl groups per glucose unit and was
Table 1
Names of starch treated by ultrasonic alone and by ultrasonic-chemical dual
treatment.
Samples Ultrasonic power (W) Ultrasonic Time (min) Chemical treatment
0-CS – – –
U1-CS 200 10 –
U2-CS 200 20 –
U3-CS 400 10 –
U4-CS 400 20 –
O-CS – – oxidation
U1-O-CS 200 10 oxidation
U2-O-CS 200 20 oxidation
U3-O-CS 400 10 oxidation
U4-O-CS 400 20 oxidation
E-CS – – esterication
U1-E-CS 200 10 esterication
U2-E-CS 200 20 esterication
U3-E-CS 400 10 esterication
U4-E-CS 400 20 esterication
C-CS – – crosslinking
U1-C-CS 200 10 crosslinking
U2-C-CS 200 20 crosslinking
U3-C-CS 400 10 crosslinking
U4-C-CS 400 20 crosslinking
M. He et al.