Carbohydrate Polymers 322 (2023) 121331
2
known as mountain savory, is the source of Satureja essential oil.
Mountain Savory essential oil may have antifungal, antibacterial, anti-
rheumatism, anti-arthritis, and hair and scalp health-benecial proper-
ties (Asadi-Yousefabad et al., 2022; Ebadollahi et al., 2021). However,
essential oils are highly susceptible to environmental conditions such as
heat, light, and pH variations, which can degrade their potency and
stability over time. Therefore, the application of an encapsulation sys-
tem can be an effective technique to inhibit environmentally detrimental
effects on essential oils.
Given the limited investigations conducted on the dual modication
of starch, recent studies have demonstrated that this approach can be
highly effective in developing protective encapsulation systems with
desired delivery properties (Punia Bangar et al., 2022; Wang et al.,
2020). In general, two consecutive modications of starch using phys-
ical, chemical, or enzymatic approaches are considered homogeneous
dual modications, while the use of physical-chemical, physical-enzy-
matic, or chemical-enzymatic methods is considered a heterogeneous
dual modication. (Ashogbon, 2021; Sahraeian et al., 2023). A research
conducted by Chen et al. (2023) resulted in a dually-modied micro-
capsule with enhanced functionality. The porous starch was modied
through esterication with caffeic acid. The dually-modied starch
exhibited strong adsorption and antioxidant capabilities. Additionally,
microcapsules signicantly protected linoleic acid from oxidation, sug-
gesting its potential utility. Chlorogenic acid was encapsulated in
hydroxypropyl tapioca starch followed by embedding in alginate
hydrogels. A sustained release of chlorogenic acid was achieved,
demonstrating a prolonged release compared to that from both hydrogel
and modied tapioca alone (Lozano-Vazquez et al., 2015). Until now,
many research on dual modication of starch has focused on creating
functional ingredients with multiple functionalities. However, limited
attention has been given to the development of encapsulation systems
for susceptible bioactive compounds, particularly essential oils.
One of the key advantages of dual modication is the ability to
achieve synergistic effects that are not attainable with single modica-
tions. By combining different modication methods, it becomes possible
to tailor starch properties more precisely and efciently. This approach
allows researchers and industries to design starch-based materials with
specic functionalities, such as controlled release, improved thermal
stability, and protection properties. Interestingly, the preparation of
hydrophobic porous starch, an aspect of dual modication, remains
relatively unexplored in the existing literature. This presents an oppor-
tunity to investigate and develop new methodologies for creating hy-
drophobic porous starch. Additionally, directing attention toward
examining the inuence of the order of modication on the ultimate
encapsulation system could prove advantageous. This particular
perspective has also been overlooked in previous investigations. This
study also delved into the impact of the modication order, examining
variations in the degree of substitution, morphology, and
crystallography.
In summary, while the potential of dually modied starch granules
was evaluated, this study investigated how the order of enzymatic and
OSA modications impacts the functional properties of the nal
encapsulation systems, encompassing essential oil loading efciency,
release rate, as well as antioxidant and antimicrobial activities.
Furthermore, alginate was used as second wall material to embed the
dually modied microcapsules, and the protective properties of alginate
hydrogels against prolonged UV radiation were evaluated.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Native corn starch was supplied by Khoosheh Zar Starch Industry in
Shiraz, Iran. Octenyl succinate (OSA) reagent was purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich Inc., and alginate (CAS No. 9005-38-3, MW:
250,000–350,000 Da, mannuronate: guluronate =25:75) was
purchased from the same supplier. Dextrozyme® DX 1.5X (DX), which
contains glucoamylase (255 AGU/g) and pullulanase (510 NPUN/g),
and Liquozyme® Supra (LS), which is an alpha-amylase (135 KNU/g),
were purchased from Novozymes in Denmark. Satureja hortensis L.
essential oil (SEO) was purchased from Deve Herbes company (New
Delhi, India). Dialysis bag was purchased from Shanghai Qiaoxing
Trading Co (Molecular weight cut-off of 5 kDa, Shanghai, China). All of
the other reagents used in the experiments were of analytical grade.
2.2. Preparation of granular OSA-modied starch
The preparation of granular OSA-modied starch was carried out
using the method described by Lopez-Silva et al. (2019). Briey, 50 g of
corn starch was accurately weighed and dispersed in 150 mL of distilled
water and gently stirred for 15 min. NaOH (1 M) was used to adjust the
pH value of the suspension to 8.75. A certain amount of OSA (%3 w/w of
the dried starch) was diluted 5 times in absolute ethanol and then added
slowly during the rst 1.5 h, at controlled pH values in the range of
8.70–8.78 throughout the modication process. The reaction was car-
ried out for 6 h at room temperature and was terminated by adding 1 M
HCl solution until the pH value reached 7. The suspension was centri-
fuged (8000g, 10 min) and then washed three times with excess distilled
water. After that, it was washed once with acetone and then again with
excess ethanol to remove OSA residue. Finally, samples were ltrated
and dried at 35 ◦C for 18 h. To obtain uniform samples, they were
crushed and passed through a 35-mesh sieve with a mesh size metric of
500
μ
m.
2.3. Enzymatic modication
Citrate-phosphate buffer was prepared (800 mL, pH =5.2) using a
proper amount of 0.1 M citric acid monohydrate and 0.2 M dipotassium
hydrogen phosphate and equally divided into three 400 mL beakers. 50
g of native starch was dispersed into two beakers and 50 g of granular
OSA starch was dispersed in another beaker. The suspensions were then
mixed for 15 min and allowed to be hydrated. Subsequently, enzymes (%
2 w/w of starch) with the portion of DX: LS =1:6 (w/w) were prepared
and added to the suspensions. The enzymatic reaction was carried out
for 8 h at 42 ◦C in a shaking incubator (50 rpm). At the end of the re-
action process, 0.1 M of NaOH was slowly added to the beakers, and the
pH value of the suspensions was adjusted to 10 in order to cease the
reaction. After the neutralization of samples, washing with distilled
water and centrifugation (8000g, 10 min) was repeated three times.
Sediments were then separated and dried in an oven at 35 ◦C overnight
Subsequently, the dried sediments were crushed and passed through a
35-mesh sieve (Zhang et al., 2012). Therefore, porous starch and OSA-
porous starch (OP) were obtained.
2.4. Preparation of OSA-modied porous starch
The method used for modifying corn porous starch with OSA was the
same as the procedure mentioned in Section 2.2. The product of this
reaction was named porous-OSA (PO) (Lopez-Silva et al., 2019).
2.5. Degree of substitution (DS)
Determination of the degree of substitution (DS) was carried out
according to the method described by Lopez-Silva et al. (2019) with
slight modications. Briey, 1.25 g of starch sample was dispersed in
12.5 mL of HCl solution (0.1 M) and was stirred (100 rpm) for 30 min
prior to centrifugation at 3000g for 10 min. The sediment was washed
once with ethanol and twice with distilled water. The sample was sus-
pended in 70 mL of distilled water and placed in a water bath containing
boiling water for 10 min. Afterward, it was allowed to cool down to
ambient temperature. Titration of suspension was carried out with 0.05
M NaOH until a pH value of 8.3 was achieved. Finally, the DS was
S. Sahraeian et al.