International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 261 (2024) 129702
2
starches with different structures and compositions [13,14].
Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L). Schott), belonging to the Araceae
family, is an edible tuber crop and widely cultivated in tropical and
subtropical regions of Asia, the Pacic Islands, Africa, and America
[15,16]. In China, taro is known as “yu tou” and is abundantly produced
in the east, south, and southwest regions. The edible corms and cormels
of taro are rich in starch, which accounts for 70–80 % of the dry basis
weight. This makes taro a potential source of starch for commercial
applications. Taro starch (TS) is a typical small granule starch with
irregular and polygonal shapes. The average granule size has been re-
ported to range from 1 to 5
μ
m [16]. Because TS has small granules and
is easy to digest, it can be used in infant and gluten-free foods [17], as a
ller in biodegradable packaging lms [18], an emulsier for Pickering
emulsions [19], and a wall material for microencapsulation of functional
oils and avors [20,21]. Various researchers have studied TS extraction,
chemical composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical and
functional properties [16]. Moreover, some studies on TS modication
have reported improved and extended properties [16,20]. Compared
with traditional commercial starches, such as corn, potato, cassava, and
rice starch, TS has not been extensively studied despite the increase in
research interest. Thus, more studies must be conducted on the char-
acteristics and modications of TS to further expand the application
scope thereof in food and other industries, thereby allowing it to
compete with commercial starch.
In light of the increased interest in applying starch in emulsions and
emulsifying system-related foods [7,22–24], studies on the hydrophobic
modication of starch have attracted increasing attention. Our previous
studies [23,25] reported that DHT is a promising and effective approach
for improving the hydrophobicity of native starch and exogenous
protein-fortied starch, which is related to an increase in the hydro-
phobicity of endogenous and exogenous proteins in starch upon DHT,
thus also matching the ndings of previous studies [10,26]. Accordingly,
we aimed to explore a more effective and convenient preparation
method for hydrophobicity-modied starch using DHT in combination
with a native starch that has a relatively high endogenous protein con-
tent. It has been shown that water-extracted TS naturally contains a high
protein content [27], thus being an ideal candidate for preparing
hydrophobicity-modied starch.
To our knowledge, the hydrophobic modication of TS by DHT and
the characteristics of modied TS have yet to be systematically studied
[28]. Therefore, based on water-extracted TS with a relatively high
endogenous protein content (1.14 %, w/w), the objective of this study
was to explore the structure and functional properties of TS modied by
DHT for different periods (1, 3, 5, and 7 h at 130 ◦C) and temperatures
(90, 110, 130, and 150 ◦C for 5 h). In particular, the impact of DHT on
the hydrophobicity of starch and the contribution of endogenous pro-
teins within starch to enhance the hydrophobicity of DHT-modied
starch were veried by contact angle measurements and deproteiniz-
ing treatment, in addition to examining the DHT mechanism.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Fresh taro corms were provided by Shandong Yimu Sweet Potato
Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. (Rizhao, Shandong, China). Amylose
from potatoes was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St.
Louis, MO, USA). Amylopectin from maize was purchased from Beijing
Solexpo Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).
α
-Amylase (58 U/mg)
and gluco-amylase (98 U/mg) were purchased from Hefei Bomei
Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hefei, Anhui, China). Dispase (100 U/mg) was
purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai,
China). Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) standards (2710, 4950,
10,900, 29,960, 62,950, 122,300, 298,900, 679,000, and 1,677,000 g/
mol) were purchased from Agilent Technologies, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA,
USA). DMSO (HPLC grade) was purchased from Shanghai Macklin
Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chem-
icals were of analytical grade and above.
2.2. Isolation of TS
To isolate TS from fresh taro corms, a water extraction method was
used. First, the washed taro corms were peeled and sliced, and after
grinding in a high-speed blender with deionized water (1:2, w/w) for
1.5 min, the resulting slurry was ltered sequentially through 100-mesh
(150
μ
m) and 300-mesh (48
μ
m) sieves to obtain a ltrate. Next, the
ltered residues were washed twice with deionized water (1:2, w/w),
and then, all the obtained ltrates were combined and centrifuged at
3000 r/min for 15 min. Furthermore, after removing the soft gray layer,
the starch cake was resuspended with deionized water and centrifuged
ve times. The nal starch cake was dried at 40 ◦C until the moisture
content was <10 %, and the dried starch cake was ground and passed
through a 150-mesh (106
μ
m) sieve to obtain the TS sample. The protein
content of the TS sample was 1.14 %, which was determined using an
automatic Kjeldahl nitrogen protein analyzer (UDK 159, VELP Scientic,
Italy).
2.3. Preparation of deproteinized TS
The deproteinized TS was prepared by protease treatment to verify
the role of the endogenous proteins in the TS morphology and hydro-
phobicity during the DHT process. Briey, TS was suspended in an acetic
acid–sodium acetate buffer (0.05 mol/L, pH 7.5) with dispase (based on
the deproteinization results from the pre-experiments, the starch and
dispase concentrations were set to 10 % (w/v) and 500 U/g starch,
respectively). Thereafter, the starch suspension was incubated in a water
bath (45 ◦C) for 4 h with rotary shaking (150 r/min) and then centri-
fuged at 1500 r/min for 10 min. After removing the soft gray layer, the
starch cake was resuspended with deionized water and centrifuged ve
times. The nal starch cake was treated using the same drying and
grinding process described in Section 2.2 to obtain the deproteinized TS
sample, denoted as TS-DP. The protein content of TS-DP was 0.20 %.
2.4. DHT of starch samples
DHT of the starch samples and parameters were selected according to
the methods published in our prior report and by Chiu et al. [4,5,25]. TS
was dry heated in an oven at 130 ◦C for 1, 3, 5, and 7 h to obtain the dry-
heated samples TS-1 h, TS-3 h, TS-5 h, and TS-7 h, respectively. Three
other dry-heated samples, namely TS-90 ◦C, TS-110 ◦C, and TS-150 ◦C,
were dry heated for 5 h at 90, 110, and 150 ◦C, respectively. The sample
TS-130 ◦C was the same as the sample TS-5 h. The TS-DP sample was dry
heated at 110 ◦C for 5 h to obtain the dry-heated sample TS-DP-110 ◦C.
The TS and TS-DP samples without DHT were designated TS-N and TS-
DP-N, respectively.
2.5. Micromorphology observations
The micromorphologies of the starch samples were observed via
scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). A
small starch sample was evenly placed on double-sided tape attached to
a specimen holder and then coated with a thin layer of gold. The
micromorphology images were captured at 1000×and 30,000×
magnication.
2.6. Particle size measurements
The particle sizes of the starch samples were measured using a laser
particle size analyzer (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern Instruments, Co., Ltd.,
Worcestershire, England) according to the method of Marefati et al. with
slight modications [29]. A starch sample (0.1 g) was pre-dispersed in
10 mL of deionized water using a high-speed disperser at 10,000 r/min
G. Hui et al.