
Food Chemistry 456 (2024) 139954
2
Various intervention strategies were developed to delay and interrupt
the lipoxidation process. Antioxidant phenolic additives have been
demonstrated to behave as a triple barrier (Zamora & Hidalgo, 2016),
whereas the roles of chelator, free radical scavenger and lipid-derived
carbonyl scavenger, are all responsible for minimizing the conse-
quence of lipoxidation. The reaction mechanisms of phenolics towards
lipid peroxidation-derived carbonyls including
α
, β-unsaturated alde-
hyde (4-hydroxy-trans-2-nonenal and acrolein), di-aldehyde (glyoxal)
have been elucidated with identication of aldehyde-phenol adducts in
chemical and food models. However, the interaction mechanism be-
tween phenolic compounds and MDA has not yet been described clearly
due to the complexity of reaction pathways. Until recently, the main
adducts formed in the reaction between the phenolic compounds (2,5-
dimethylresorcinol, orcinol, olivetol, and alkylresorcinol) and MDA
were produced via the reaction of one molecule of the phenol, one
molecule of MDA, and additional one molecule of acetaldehyde (which
is absent in other carbonyl-phenol reaction) (Zamora, Alcon, & Hidalgo,
2023).
The recognition of phenols as MDA-trapping agents justies their
application in retarding MDA-induced lipoxidation. Theoretically, fast
scavenging of MDA by phenol contributes to protection on proteins by
inactivation or removal of MDA. Nevertheless, in a complicated food
system with co-existence of protein, MDA, and phenol, multiple re-
actions happen among these compounds. The A ring of phenol, with OH
groups at meta-positions, is involved in trapping of MDA through
nucleophilic addition. The B ring of phenols, with OH groups at the
ortho-positions, is often engaged in antioxidant activities donating H-
atoms to free radicals, leading to the formation of corresponding qui-
nones with further reactivity towards nucleophilic groups on proteins
(Farooq, Abdullah, Zhang, & Weiss, 2021). Hence, the variations in
protein physicochemical properties introduced by phenolic MDA-
trapping agents need to be evaluated to avoid potential adverse effects
on protein quality.
Epicatechin (EC), as a major ingredient in popular tea beverages, was
selected as the potential MDA-trapping agent in this study. The position
OH groups in A ring of EC which meets the structural requirement (meta-
diphenols) in trapping of MDA. However, the ortho-positions OH groups
in B ring may implicate possible phenol-protein interaction which could
cause protein cross-linking and aggregation. Therefore, the effects of EC
in a typical dietary protein (whey protein isolate, WPI) under exposure
to MDA were investigated. The efciency of EC in eliminating MDA was
measured by HPLC and the resultant mitigation on MDA-induced lip-
oxidation was visualized by Western blot analysis. The physiochemical
changes were revealed by monitoring protein carbonylation, sulfhydryl
content, surface hydrophobicity as well as uorescence proles of
intrinsic tryptophan and Schiff base adducts. The inuence of EC on
protein surface microstructure and protein hydrolysis were also evalu-
ated. The ndings of the present study may provide a theoretical basis
for the development of phenolic MDA-trapping agents in controlling
lipid oxidation product-mediated protein damage in food system.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Material
WPI (>92% protein in dry basis) was supplied by Hilmar Ingredients
(Hilmar, CA, USA). 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane, the enzymes used for
simulated gastrointestinal digestion, including pepsin (≥250 units/mg,
solid), trypsin (8 ×USP specications), were the products of Sigma-
Aldrich Co., LLC (United States). The rabbit polyclonal specically
binds to MDA-modied proteins (Ab27642) and the goat anti-rabbit IgG
H&L (HRP) secondary antibody were purchased from Abcam (Cam-
bridge, UK). 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane,1-anilino-8-naphthalenesul-
fonate, trichloroacetic acid, acetonitrile, 5,5
′
-dithiobis (2-
nitrobenzoicacid), 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), guanidine hy-
drochloride, Brilliant blue R250, and other reagents were all purchased
from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China) or Tokyo Chemical
Industry Co., Ltd. (Japan). All chemicals used in the study were of
analytical grade and acetonitrile was of HPLC grade.
2.2. Preparation of MDA
For each experiment, MDA was freshly prepared by acidic hydrolysis
of 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane (TMP) according to the procedure
described in a previous study (Kikugawa, Tsukuda, & Kurechi, 1980).
Briey, acid hydrolysis was carried out by the incubation of 845
μ
L TMP
and 1 mL HCl (1 M) in 3.16 mL ultrapure water for 2.5 min at 40 ◦C. 6 M
NaOH was used to adjust the pH to 7.4. The obtained MDA solution was
diluted 200 times with 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and the MDA
concentration was measured at the UV absorbance of 267 nm and
calculated with a molar extinction coefcient value of 31,500 mol
−1
cm
−1
.
2.3. Retained MDA content after the incubation with EC
To understand the interactions between MDA and EC, MDA (1 mM)
was incubated with EC (0.1, 1, and 2 mM) in 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) at
25 ◦C for 24 h. The residual MDA was monitored by the Agilent 1260
Innity II HPLC system with a separation module (G7111B), an auto-
sampler (G7129E), and a multiwavelength UV detector (G7115A). Re-
action mixtures were chromatographically separated by a YMC Pro C18
column (250 ×4.6 mm, 5
μ
m). The ow rate was 1 mL/min, and the
column temperature was kept at 25 ◦C. The mobile phase was composed
of deionized (DI) water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and aceto-
nitrile (solvent B). Gradient elution (ow rate: 1 mL/min) was carried
out for 98% solvent A in 0 to 8 min, 80% solvent A in 8 to 20 min, and
98% solvent A in 20 to 30 min. MDA was monitored the at the wave-
length of 245 nm according to a previous study of Cai et al. (2011).
2.4. MDA-induced protein lipoxidation
MDA-induced protein lipoxidation reaction system was established
according to a previous report by Zheng et al. (2022). In 10 mM phos-
phate buffer (pH 7.4), MDA (1 mM) was co-incubated with WPI (6 mg/
mL) and EC (0, 0.1, 1, and 2 mM). The reaction was carried out at 25 ◦C
for 24 h in the darkness with the addition of 0.02% sodium azide as
germicide.
2.5. Protein carbonylation
Protein carbonyl content in WPI was measured according to the
procedure of Levine (Levine, Wehr, Williams, Stadtman, & Shacter,
2000). Briey, 0.2 mL DNPH derivatization reagent (0.1% w/v dissolved
in 2 M HCl) was added to 0.1 mL of the reaction mixture. The deriva-
tization process was last for 1 h at room temperature. Carbonylated
proteins were then precipitated by 20% TCA solution (w/v) and washed
with ethanol/ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) at least 3 times. Finally, the ob-
tained protein precipitate was dissolved in guanidine hydrochloride (8
M). The UV absorption was monitored at 370 nm and the protein
carbonyl content (nmol carbonyl/protein) was calculated as follows:
Protein carbonyl content (nmol carbonyl/protein) = A370
ε
×106
C.
where A
370
is the UV absorbance at 370 nm, C is the MP concentration,
and
ε
is the absorption coefcient of 22,000 mol
−1
cm
−1
.
2.6. Protein sulfhydryls
The total sulfhydryl content of WPI was measured using Ellman's
method (Ellman, 1959). Briey, urea-SDS solution was prepared by
dissolving 8.0 M urea and 0.03 g/mL SDS in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH
W. Yao et al.